- SmartStack: AI, Self-Hosting & Smart Finance/
- Posts/
- How Much Time Should You Spend on Tiny Details? A Look at Over-Engineering a Game Asset/
How Much Time Should You Spend on Tiny Details? A Look at Over-Engineering a Game Asset
Table of Contents
“I Spent Way Too Much Time on This”: The Indie Dev Dilemma #
We’ve all been there. You’re building something cool—maybe a game, maybe a small side project—and you decide this one thing deserves just a little extra polish. In this case, someone on r/sideproject spent what sounds like hours perfecting a pillow-like material for their in-game assets. Was it worth it? Sometimes, yes. Obsession is what gives indie devs our edge. Other times? Total rabbit hole. Let’s unpack when it’s good to go hard on small details (and when you’re just digging a grave for your schedule).
Why Over-Engineer a Pillow? #
Because it matters emotionally. Details like a juicy pillow texture, or the way light interacts with fabric, make your world feel alive. They’re the invisible glue that tells your player, “Hey, someone cared about this game.”
Think about Untitled Goose Game. Those honks? Couldn’t be more basic, but they’re just-polished-enough to make the Goose feel real. Would that game still slap with boring, default honk sounds? Probably not. The magic is in minor obsessions that stack into something memorable.
But here’s the catch: not all details pull their weight.
Take the Redditor’s pillow. If this texture is going to appear once, in some random cutscene, was that 5+ hours of tweaking worth it? Eh, probably not. But if it’s part of your game’s core loop? That’s a completely different story.
Two Kinds of Tiny Projects #
Not all over-engineering is created equal. Here’s the breakdown:
1. Reusable Assets That Pay Dividends #
Textures, shaders, animation techniques—these are investments. Spend time now polishing that cloth physics or lighting behavior, and you’ll reuse it everywhere.
Example: Perfecting a pillow shader that can double as a couch cushion, bed mattress, or car seat. Reusability justifies time spent because it has leverage.
But you’ve got to think system-level. If that overly-polished pillow works in one scene but breaks the lighting in another? Congrats, you’ve just nerfed your dev time into oblivion. Always test assets across multiple game environments early.
2. Excessive Detail in One-Offs #
Now we’re in danger territory. If your polished pillow appears only in Level 3 of a 10-level game, congratulations: you lost an afternoon making art your player might not even notice. Worse, spending time here can wreck your momentum. It’s this second category that burns most devs. You focus on tiny, tucked-away moments at the expense of what matters to players overall.
Tools of the Trade (and Their Pitfalls) #
If you’re obsessing over a texture or material, chances are you’ve got some favorite tools. Let’s run through a few common ones:
1. Blender + Substance Painter Combo #
This duo is an indie-dev darling. You use Blender to model/texturize, then Substance for detailing. It’s how a lot of the polished assets you see on Reddit threads are born.
But—the setup time. Substance Painter isn’t cheap, starting from $149/year, and the learning curve is real. I’ve seen devs spend days on just understanding proper UV unwrapping rather than actual asset creation. For advanced teams, it’s a godsend. For someone with a two-week game jam window? Overkill.
2. Unity’s Built-in Materials vs Asset Store #
Unity’s standard shader tools are surprisingly decent at quick wins. But when you start layering effects to get exactly the look in your head, performance hits fast. Grab your over-designed pillow, throw it in a mobile build, and see how your 60fps disappears. Pro tip: Baking lighting and textures can save you.
Alternatively, the Asset Store has premade cloth and texture packs starting at $3-$10. Unless your pillow is core to the game, this is a huge time-saver.
3. Procedural Textures in Godot #
For the Godot fans, shoutout to procedural materials. Godot 4’s new Vulkan renderer lets you do some wild things with live shader tweaking. If you’re building a consistent pillow or couch aesthetic, procedural’s flexibility could save you time long-term. Big downside? Debugging custom shaders is basically masochism.
When to Stop Perfecting the Damn Pillow #
Here’s the rule I follow:
If you’re learning something new—a sharper workflow, better texturing skills—then the time spent isn’t wasted. It’s training. Even if the pillow doesn’t make the final cut, you level up.
But if you’re piling detail into a tiny, insignificant piece of your game while ignoring the boring-but-critical stuff (menus, onboarding, collision bugs)? Stop. Fix the janky core experience first.
TL;DR #
Tiny obsessions can make or break indie games. Details polish the final product, but don’t kill yourself over one unimportant asset. Prioritize system-level work, pick tools that match your timeline (not just your ambition), and know when to move on. The best games feel polished, but most of that polish comes from good design choices—not a single over-engineered pillow.